Call 24/7 801-810-9999
Book a Consultation
Find out why so many clients appreciate the amount of work we put into their case.
"*" indicates required fields
Around two-thirds of US adults, or about 131 million people, use prescription medications for a variety of ailments. For many, these medications can be lifesaving or provide relief from pain and other symptoms. While most prescription drugs produce an improvement in the patient’s condition, sometimes people have bad reactions. In less common situations, these adverse reactions can be severe or even life-threatening.
If you’ve experienced such a reaction, you may have concerns about your medication or what happened. An adverse event doesn’t necessarily mean that the drug itself is dangerous – everyone reacts differently to medications, and most drugs have some potential for serious side effects. However, it’s worth discussing your situation with a dangerous drugs lawyer to learn more.
Your attorney can help you determine whether your medication was unreasonably dangerous. Under Utah law, this is an important part of any product liability claim. “Unreasonably dangerous” means that the product is more dangerous than the average consumer would expect based on what they know about it. Your lawyer will consider your case, the adverse reaction you suffered, the drug facts that come with the medication, and other factors to evaluate whether the medication you took was unreasonably dangerous. They will also investigate the cause of the problem so they can decide which of three categories your case falls into:
A design defect is an inherent problem with the product, in this case, a drug. Often the medication works in a way that addresses one health problem but could cause another. It can be hard to know if your medication has a design defect because all medications have some risk of side effects. However, if the drug creates a risk that is unreasonable compared to its benefits, and the drug cannot be formulated in a way that eliminates this risk, then there may be a drug defect.
One example is the drug Vioxx, an arthritis medication touted for having a lower risk of gastrointestinal side effects than older drugs like naproxen. Unfortunately, it was designed to work in a way that changed the balance of two key enzymes that control blood clotting, which ultimately led to an increased risk of heart attack or strokes. More than 60,000 people filed lawsuits against Vioxx’s manufacturer, Merck, most of which were settled in multi-district legislation (MDL) for a total of $4.85 billion dollars.
In Utah, design defect cases require demonstrating that there was a safer way to design the drug to avoid unreasonable risk. Your lawyer will probably use expert witnesses to explain the defect in the drug and how it could have been designed in a safer way.
In the case of a manufacturing defect, there is nothing wrong with the design of the drug, but something went awry in the production process. When this happens, usually only certain lots are affected, and the manufacturer can recall these lots. The affected drugs are frequently contaminated with bacteria, other drugs, chemicals, or even pieces of metal or glass. Unfortunately, if you received and used one of these medications before it was recalled, you could suffer serious health effects.
To prove a manufacturing defect case, your lawyer will work to show that there was a manufacturing problem that caused certain batches of the medication to be unreasonably dangerous. They will also need to provide evidence that the defect was in the medication at the time it was sold and that this defect caused your injuries. The last point is often the most difficult and complicated to prove, and again your attorney may use medical experts and other types of evidence to support your case.
Not all risks associated with medications are unreasonably dangerous to the point that the drug should be removed from the market. As we discussed earlier, all drugs have some risk of side effects. Many commonly-prescribed drugs carry at least a low risk of potentially serious side effects. However, the manufacturer has a responsibility to make patients and prescribers aware of these risks so they can be considered and, in some cases, mitigated. For example, a drug that slightly increases the risk of heart attack or stroke might still be relatively safe for most patients. Still, people with other risk factors for these conditions might want to consider another treatment.
The problem arises when patients and their doctors aren’t made aware of the risks. If your doctor doesn’t know that a medication carries specific risks, they can’t adequately decide on the best treatment option for you.
Failure to warn cases often coincides with design defects. The makers of Vioxx, for instance, suspected there could be cardiovascular risks from the start due to the nature of the drug. They carefully designed studies on the drug that used patients with a low risk of cardiovascular disease who only took the drug for short periods of time, concealing the risk. When concerns did come to light, Merck claimed that other drugs had a protective effect on the heart rather than Vioxx causing a higher risk of heart problems. Eventually, the company added a warning about cardiovascular side effects before ultimately withdrawing the drug from the market. But by then, tens of thousands of people had suffered strokes and heart attacks while using Vioxx.
In Utah, people pursuing a failure to warn case must demonstrate that the manufacturer didn’t provide adequate warning when the drug was sold. With dangerous drug cases, this usually rests on the information provided to the patient with the prescription and the provider’s information. You will also need to show that this lack of warning made the drug unreasonably dangerous and was the cause of your injuries.
Depending on the situation, sometimes it may be easier to prove a failure to warn case than a design defect case, although in other circumstances, it may be possible to prove both.
If you’ve taken a drug that was later recalled or whose manufacturer added additional warnings, it’s a good idea to speak with a dangerous drugs lawyer, even if you haven’t yet suffered a serious problem. In some cases, the risk may continue even after stopping the medication. (You should never stop taking a medication before discussing it with your doctor.)
If there hasn’t been a recall, it can be more difficult to know whether you’ve been affected. Some drugs stay on the market for years before problems are identified and addressed – especially if the manufacturer took steps to hide the issues. Here are some concerning situations you should look out for:
If your Salt Lake City personal injury lawyer finds evidence that you were harmed by a dangerous drug, they can help you puruse damages, including the following:
Please contact Valley Law Accident and Injury Lawyers at 801-810-9999 for a free consultation if you suspect a dangerous drug harmed you or a loved one. We’ll evaluate your case, do more research if needed, answer your questions, and explain the options for pursuing compensation.
So you met with your insurance provider, but you aren’t satisfied with the amount your insurance company wants to hand over to you after a car accident. What do you…
Yes, liability insurance often can and does cover your car if someone hits you, but only if the accident wasn’t your fault. But before making a liability claim, there is…
We have helped many clients recover from injuries resulting from car accidents in West Valley, Salt Lake City, and the greater Utah area. We are here to help you recover after an accident. If you've been injured, don't hesitate to call Valley Law Accident and Injury Lawyers for a free consultation. We have recovered millions for our clients and we are ready to fight for you.
Get in touch
2021 and 2022 Gold Winner for Top Law Firm by Salt City Best
Call 24/7 801-810-9999